Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Yi-34B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 35.0 to 7.5.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index37.827.8
Released2025-02-052023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Coding13221112
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13241104
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Math13091114
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Expert13051061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Non-English13231079
LMArena Chinese13391176
LMArena French13471081
LMArena German13061042
LMArena Japanese1301993
LMArena Korean1325959
LMArena Russian13281050
LMArena Spanish13131070

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13051091
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query13201094

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-34B
LMArena Text13301129
LMArena Creative Writing13191108
LMArena Multi-Turn13071113
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Yi-34B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Yi-34B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Yi-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper