Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 35.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 96% for Grok 4.7.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index37.853.1
Released2025-02-052026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked3239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Coding13221427
FrontierCode—47.6%
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1639
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.8%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts13241413
DTBench52.5%96%
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA—49.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.53
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Math13091407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—53%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.1%
ProofBench—34%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Expert13051422
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—56%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision11001228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English13231389
LMArena Chinese13391455
LMArena French13471455
LMArena Russian13281397
LMArena Spanish13131400
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following13051404
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query13201413

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4.7
LMArena Text13301399
LMArena Creative Writing13191391
LMArena Multi-Turn13071393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.7 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper