Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 34.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 52.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.