Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and o1 in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1 leads 27.9 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 73.3% for o1.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | 47.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1367 |
| CadEval | 34% | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | 80.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 7.5% | 10% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | 41.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1371 |
| DTBench | 59% | 74.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 141.91 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | 8% |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1361 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1168 |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1344 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and o1 share?
31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.