Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs GLM-4.7-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.7-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 36.1 to 25.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2026-01-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1383 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1356 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1355 |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 60.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1357 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1330 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1332 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1327 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1345 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than GLM-4.7-Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and GLM-4.7-Flash share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.