Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 14.2.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 44.2 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.53 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1475 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Hy3: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1493 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1456 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1426 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1436 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Hy3 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.