Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.9

Rank #301 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.4 to 14.2.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index29.946.2
Released2024-10-032026-03-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2120

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding12181457

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts12091448
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
DTBench50%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math12071442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.6%—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert11851445
GPQA Diamond33%—

Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision10441259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English12151440
LMArena Chinese12311475
LMArena French12341466
LMArena German12061456
LMArena Japanese11501405
LMArena Korean11401416
LMArena Russian12361457
LMArena Spanish12121447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following11991420

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query12191431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text12261450
LMArena Creative Writing12181436
LMArena Multi-Turn11851452

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper