Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 2B

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.9

Rank #301 Confirmed

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads 42.8 to 24.0.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2B specifications
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index29.929.6
Released2024-10-032024-02-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2123

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Coding12181010
HumanEval+—20.7%
MBPP+—34.1%

Reasoning Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Hard Prompts1209989
DTBench50%—
BIG-Bench Hard—35.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—94.2
HellaSwag—71.4%
PIQA—77.3%
WinoGrande—65.4%

Math Gemma 2B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Math12071009
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.6%—
GSM8K—17.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Gemma 2B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
GPQA Diamond33%—
LMArena Expert1185—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—42.1%
BoolQ—69.4%
MMLU—42.3%
TriviaQA—53.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Gemma 2B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Vision1044—

Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Non-English1215958
LMArena Chinese1231986
LMArena Russian1236937
LMArena French1234—
LMArena German1206—
LMArena Japanese1150—
LMArena Korean1140—
LMArena Spanish1212—

Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Instruction Following1199970

Long Context Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Longer Query1219981

Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGemma 2B
LMArena Text12261002
LMArena Creative Writing1218987
LMArena Multi-Turn1185945

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Gemma 2B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper