Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Gemma 2B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 29.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Gemma 2B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.