Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 37.4 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 70.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
  • Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.338.9
Released2023-12-132025-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding11081416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts11091398
DTBench45.9%69.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04139.63
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
LMCA—22.4%

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%70.3%
LMArena Math11321394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond34%70.1%
LMArena Expert10591396
Confabulations—12.3%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English11381372
LMArena Chinese11241433
LMArena French11451418
LMArena German11251380
LMArena Japanese10231337
LMArena Russian11861370
LMArena Spanish11191404
LMArena Korean—1331

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following11141363

Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query11321379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text11491384
LMArena Creative Writing11311317
LMArena Multi-Turn11391378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper