Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5-Air
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 36.2 to 9.3.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-07-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1397 |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1379 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
Math GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1370 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1426 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1399 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1377 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1348 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1386 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1354 |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1371 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5-Air?
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?
GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.