Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs o1-mini
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o1-mini leads 33.7 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 89.2% for o1-mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 78.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1333 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 135.82 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 89.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 62.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1316 |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1292 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1245 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1302 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
Instruction Following o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1321 |
Writing & Preference o1-mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than o1-mini?
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or o1-mini better for coding?
o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1-mini share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.