Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 36.4 to 8.7.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 141.42 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1432 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1431 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1443 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1453 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1414 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1414 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.