Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 59.1 to 36.2.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 145.84 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1420 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1443 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1439 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1422 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1261 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1404 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1413 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.