Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.1

Rank #327 Confirmed

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

37.7

Rank #186 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 34.9 to 8.7.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.137.7
Released2023-12-132025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding11081413
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11091372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.97—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math11321364
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert10591337
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English11381345
LMArena Chinese11241356
LMArena French11441394
LMArena German11251324
LMArena Japanese10231309
LMArena Russian11861367
LMArena Spanish11181360
LMArena Korean—1307

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11141356

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11321379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text11491356
LMArena Creative Writing11301333
LMArena Multi-Turn11391365

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.2 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper