Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.1

Rank #327 Confirmed

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 56.8 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 96.1% for Kimi K2.6.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index27.147.5
Released2023-12-132026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked2451

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Coding11081488
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
ALE-Bench—1,093
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Hard Prompts11091470
DTBench45.9%90.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.97151.03
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
LMCA—37.3%

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%96.1%
LMArena Math11321475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—25.6%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—72.9%
ProofBench—16%
MATH Level 511.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
GPQA Diamond34%90.8%
LMArena Expert10591491
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Vision—1282
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English11381446
LMArena Chinese11241521
LMArena French11441471
LMArena German11251449
LMArena Japanese10231442
LMArena Russian11861446
LMArena Spanish11181463
LMArena Korean—1428

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following11141451

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query11321468

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.6
LMArena Text11491455
LMArena Creative Writing11301434
LMArena Multi-Turn11391453
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Kimi K2.6 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper