Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.1 leads 49.7 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 93.3% for GLM-5.1.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index27.347.8
Released2023-12-132026-04-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked2441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
LMArena Coding11081485
SWE-bench Verified—74.2%
LMArena WebDev—1508
SciCode—43.8%
WeirdML—57.1%
ALE-Bench—887.1
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
APEX-Agents—40.9%
ExploitBench—18.1%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—5,634

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
LMArena Hard Prompts11091472
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04149.84
SimpleBench—55.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—77.7%
CritPt—4.6%
Chess Puzzles—19%
Thematic Generalization—69.8%
DTBench45.9%—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%93.3%
LMArena Math11321473
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.1%
ProofBench—22.2%
MATH Level 511.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—33.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—12.5%

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
GPQA Diamond34%89.9%
LMArena Expert10591476
SimpleQA Verified—34%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
LMArena Non-English11381447
LMArena Chinese11241515
LMArena French11451474
LMArena German11251465
LMArena Japanese10231434
LMArena Russian11861454
LMArena Spanish11191469
LMArena Korean—1418

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
LMArena Instruction Following11141451

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
LMArena Longer Query11321466

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.1
LMArena Text11491461
LMArena Creative Writing11311453
LMArena Multi-Turn11391472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1592

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-5.1 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper