Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 43.0 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 96.4% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Results tracked | 53 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.9 (#71), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1108 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.5 (#50), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#310), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 73.6% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.42 | 116.97 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| LMCA | 30.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.0 (#69), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1395 | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | 11.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.6 (#146), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | 1059 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 70% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 27.0 (#111), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 50.1 (#124), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1376 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1408 | 1144 |
| LMArena German | 1377 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1380 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1118 |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.6 (#144), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1114 |
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#86), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 58.1 (#119), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1371 | 1130 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1139 |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.