Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

59.2

Rank #17 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.6 Terra in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.6 Terra leads 81.6 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 99.7% for GPT-5.6 Terra.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index27.359.2
Released2023-12-132026-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$12
Results tracked2452

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.7 (#19)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Coding11081484
DeepSWE—69.6%
FrontierCode—41.3%
CursorBench—41.3%
LMArena WebDev—1522
SciCode—55%
WeirdML—78.3%
ALE-Bench—1,951
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.1 (#25)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
APEX-Agents—58.2%
BALROG—53.2%
GDP.pdf—24.7%
Vending-Bench 2—7,343

Reasoning GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GPT-5.6 Terra: 60.7 (#21)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Hard Prompts11091468
DTBench45.9%93.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04159.62
ARC-AGI-2—83.9%
SimpleBench—48.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—51.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—78.4%
ARC-AGI-1—96.5%
CritPt—30%
Chess Puzzles—54%
Mystery Game Puzzles—35%
LMCA—55%
Surface Evolver Bench—83.8%

Math GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GPT-5.6 Terra: 81.6 (#12)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%99.7%
LMArena Math11321466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—86%
FrontierMath Tier 4—70.7%
ProofBench—74%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.2 (#30)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
GPQA Diamond34%93.3%
LMArena Expert10591492
SimpleQA Verified—43.2%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.3 (#11)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision—1271
Blueprint-Bench 2—30.8%
Furniture Assembly—54.2%
LMArena Document—1472

Multilingual GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4 (#44)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Non-English11381439
LMArena Chinese11241513
LMArena French11451471
LMArena German11251460
LMArena Japanese10231457
LMArena Russian11861450
LMArena Spanish11191448
LMArena Korean—1425

Instruction Following GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GPT-5.6 Terra: 76.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Instruction Following11141454

Long Context GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GPT-5.6 Terra: 44.4 (#68)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Longer Query11321451

Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.2 (#23)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text11491447
LMArena Creative Writing11311410
LMArena Multi-Turn11391449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1855
EQ-Bench 4—1234

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-5.6 Terra better for coding?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 57.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-5.6 Terra share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Terra has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper