Model comparison
Falcon-7B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | — | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-04-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 28.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 78.1% | — |
| LAMBADA | 74.9% | — |
| PIQA | 80.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 67.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 6.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 47.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.3% | — |
| MMLU | 35% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 51.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-7B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.