Model comparison
Falcon-7B vs Mercury 2
Mercury 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#167); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- Falcon-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Inception |
| Noometry Index | — | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-04-24 | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1170 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1391 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1362 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 28.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 78.1% | — |
| LAMBADA | 74.9% | — |
| PIQA | 80.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 67.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 6.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1358 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 47.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.3% | — |
| MMLU | 35% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 51.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1303 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1328 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1329 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-7B better than Mercury 2?
Mercury 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#167); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Mercury 2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.