Model comparison
Falcon-7B vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout has enough public results to be ranked (#323); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | — | 27.4 |
| Released | 2023-04-24 | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1286 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.49 | 129.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1266 |
| DTBench | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 28.8% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | 78.1% | — |
| LAMBADA | 74.9% | — |
| PIQA | 80.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 67.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1286 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 6.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 51.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1236 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 47.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.3% | — |
| MMLU | 35% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 51.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1256 |
| LMArena French | — | 1283 |
| LMArena German | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1277 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1248 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1265 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1249 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 783 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1281 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-7B better than Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout has enough public results to be ranked (#323); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Llama 4 Scout share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.