Model comparison

Falcon-7B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#170); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Falcon-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-7B and Gemini 2.5 Flash specifications
Falcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index—39.3
Released2023-04-242025-04-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1254

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—28.7%
Aider Polyglot—55.1%
WeirdML—41.9%
LMArena Coding—1424
ALE-Bench—661.88

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench—17.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—56.2%
TheAgentCompany—41.1%
BALROG—33.5%
Vending-Bench 2—548.84

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index95.1143.03
ARC-AGI-2—2.5%
SimpleBench—41.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—56.8%
ARC-AGI-1—33.3%
CritPt—1.1%
EnigmaEval—2.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1422
DTBench—76.5%
LMCA—27.5%
BIG-Bench Hard28.8%—
ForecastBench—60.6
HellaSwag78.1%—
LAMBADA74.9%—
PIQA80.3%—
WinoGrande67.2%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.1%
Omni-MATH—38.5%
LMArena Math—1415
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—4.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K6.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam—12.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.9%
Confabulations—16.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.8%
GPQA (HELM)—39%
LMArena Expert—1426
ARC (AI2) Challenge47.9%—
BoolQ75.3%—
MMLU35%—
OpenBookQA51.6%—
TriviaQA64.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision—1253
GeoBench—76%
VPCT—46.2%
SpatialViz-Bench—36.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1409
LMArena Chinese—1450
LMArena French—1433
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1385
LMArena Russian—1415
LMArena Spanish—1421

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
IFEval—89.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1405

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench—77.8%
LMArena Longer Query—1419

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1400
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.5%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1137
WildBench—81.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1408

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-7B better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#170); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Gemini 2.5 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper