Model comparison
Falcon 2 11B vs Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 2 9B has enough public results to be ranked (#341); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | — | 25.9 |
| Released | 2024-05-09 | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 34.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1173 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 109.56 | 119.83 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1171 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 36.4% |
| HellaSwag | 82.9% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 28.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.7% |
| WinoGrande | 78.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 53.8% | 84.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 19.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1183 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 21% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 58.4% | 72.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1147 |
| BoolQ | — | 85.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1185 |
| LMArena French | — | 1190 |
| LMArena German | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1144 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1200 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1200 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 52.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1178 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1197 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1206 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 841 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1193 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon 2 11B better than Gemma 2 9B?
Gemma 2 9B has enough public results to be ranked (#341); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon 2 11B and Gemma 2 9B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon 2 11B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 9B has 35.