Model comparison
Falcon 2 11B vs Gemma 2 27B
Gemma 2 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#302); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | — | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-05-09 | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 8K |
| Max output | — | 2K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 109.25 | 122.06 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1199 |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| HellaSwag | 82.9% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |
| WinoGrande | 78.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1212 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |
| GSM8K | 53.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 58.4% | 75.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1172 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1221 |
| LMArena French | — | 1246 |
| LMArena German | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1206 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1231 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon 2 11B better than Gemma 2 27B?
Gemma 2 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#302); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon 2 11B and Gemma 2 27B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon 2 11B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.