Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GLM-4.5-Air

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GLM-4.5-Air specifications
Falcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index32.238.9
Released2023-09-062025-07-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.10
Results tracked1627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
GSO—2.9%
LMArena Coding—1397

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Hard Prompts10071379
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
ForecastBench—59.2
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
Omni-MATH—39.1%
LMArena Math—1396
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro—76.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%
LMArena Expert—1370
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Non-English10001366
LMArena Chinese—1426
LMArena French—1399
LMArena German—1377
LMArena Japanese—1348
LMArena Korean—1308
LMArena Russian—1373
LMArena Spanish—1386

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Instruction Following10471354
IFEval—81.2%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Longer Query—1366

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Text10541384
LMArena Creative Writing10891343
LMArena Multi-Turn10131371
WildBench—78.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-4.5-Air share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper