Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Mistral AISummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 40.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1461 |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 141.35 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1431 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1432 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1442 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1409 |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1415 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.