Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1339 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1361 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1317 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1370 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1312 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiniMax M1 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.