Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Llama 2-7B
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Falcon-180B leads 19.1 to 15.7.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1002 |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1009 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | 73.3% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | 69.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 54.4% | 16.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1042 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | 89% | 77.9% |
| MMLU | 70.6% | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | 58.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1036 |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 973 |
| LMArena French | — | 970 |
| LMArena German | — | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1006 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 999 |
Writing & Preference Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 2-7B?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 2-7B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.