Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

48.1

Rank #57 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.1 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180BKimi K2.5
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMoonshot AI
Noometry Index32.248.1
Released2023-09-062026-01-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$2.25
Results tracked1651

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
SWE-bench Verified—73.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—70.8%
LMArena WebDev—1437
SWE-bench Multilingual—67.3%
SciCode—49%
WeirdML—45.6%
LMArena Coding—1474
ALE-Bench—821.65

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
Terminal-Bench—43.2%
OSWorld—63.3%
Vending-Bench 2—1,198

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10071453
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13148.03
ARC-AGI-2—11.8%
SimpleBench—46.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—78.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—69.9%
ARC-AGI-1—65.3%
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles—12%
EnigmaEval—3.4%
Thematic Generalization—69.4%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—62.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—92.2%
LMArena Math—1470
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—27.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
GPQA Diamond—87.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—24.4%
SimpleQA Verified—34.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.2%
LMArena Expert—1466
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
LMArena Vision—1269
LMArena Document—1430

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
LMArena Non-English10001433
LMArena Chinese—1495
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1441
LMArena Japanese—1421
LMArena Korean—1410
LMArena Russian—1435
LMArena Spanish—1450

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
LMArena Instruction Following10471431

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
Fiction.LiveBench—86.1%
CL-bench—19.3%
CL-bench Life—13.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2.5
LMArena Text10541445
LMArena Creative Writing10891423
LMArena Multi-Turn10131444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2.5 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper