Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 leads 58.5 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Grok 4 specifications
Falcon-180BGrok 4
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstitutexAI
Noometry Index32.248.1
Released2023-09-062025-07-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1648

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
Aider Polyglot—79.6%
WeirdML—45.7%
LMArena Coding—1408

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
LMArena Hard Prompts10071409
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13146.44
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.6%
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
ForecastBench—60.9
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84%
Omni-MATH—60.3%
LMArena Math—1422
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
GPQA Diamond—87%
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%
LMArena Expert—1415
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
LMArena Vision—1210
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
LMArena Non-English10001403
LMArena Chinese—1427
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1429
LMArena Japanese—1394
LMArena Korean—1377
LMArena Russian—1410
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
LMArena Instruction Following10471387
IFEval—94.9%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1409

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4
LMArena Text10541411
LMArena Creative Writing10891397
LMArena Multi-Turn10131416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
WildBench—79.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Grok 4 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper