Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Falcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMoonshot AI
Noometry Index32.241.2
Released2023-09-062025-07-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked1642

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—63.4%
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—42.8%
LMArena Coding—1399
ALE-Bench—597.5

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Hard Prompts10071384
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13146.01
SimpleBench—26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
ForecastBench—60.2
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Omni-MATH—65.4%
LMArena Math—1397
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%
LMArena Expert—1365
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English10001372
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1379
LMArena German—1387
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1325
LMArena Russian—1385
LMArena Spanish—1386

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following10471348
IFEval—85%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1353

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text10541380
LMArena Creative Writing10891350
LMArena Multi-Turn10131371
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper