Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GPT-4.1 nano
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.1 nano in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GPT-4.1 nano leads 41.8 to 25.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 27.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 8.9% |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 19% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1306 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 33% |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1286 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 129.62 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 33.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 28.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 55% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1272 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1063 |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 nano leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1270 |
| LMArena German | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1199 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1261 |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 nano leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1267 |
| IFEval | — | 84.3% |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 25% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1283 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 nano leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1285 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1277 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 946 |
| WildBench | — | 81.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-4.1 nano?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-4.1 nano share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 nano has 38.