Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.1 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-09-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1340 |
| SciCode | — | 38.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1449 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 340.82 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1499 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1436 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1410 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1422 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-4.6?
GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-4.6 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.