Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 35.5.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
GLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index38.932.4
Released2025-07-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding13971186
GSO2.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.5-Air: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13791145
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
ForecastBench59.2—

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Math13961152
Omni-MATH39.1%—

Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert13701142
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13661099
LMArena Chinese14261145
LMArena Russian13731092
LMArena French1399—
LMArena German1377—
LMArena Japanese1348—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13541131
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661162

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text13841150
LMArena Creative Writing13431129
LMArena Multi-Turn13711108
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper