Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GLM-4.5

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5 leads 57.5 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GLM-4.5 specifications
Falcon-180BGLM-4.5
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index32.242.0
Released2023-09-062025-07-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked1627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—54.2%
WeirdML—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1434
ALE-Bench—344.82
AlgoTune—1.52

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10071429
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
LMArena Math—1427
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
Humanity's Last Exam—8.3%
Confabulations—11.3%
LMArena Expert—1433
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
LMArena Non-English10001417
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1407
LMArena Japanese—1415
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Russian—1414
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following10471404

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1412

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGLM-4.5
LMArena Text10541430
LMArena Creative Writing10891395
LMArena Multi-Turn10131415
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1343

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-4.5 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper