Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.3 to 29.3.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-05-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1269 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1310 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1255 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1277 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.