Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiniMax-M2
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1370 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1352 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena French | — | 1335 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1328 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1331 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiniMax-M2?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiniMax-M2 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.