Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.7 Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 19.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index32.259.8
Released2023-09-062026-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$3.75
Results tracked1644

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSWE—65.5%
FrontierCode—43.6%
LMArena WebDev—1592
FrontierSWE—20.3%
SciCode—59.8%
LMArena Coding—1497
ALE-Bench—904.3

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
APEX-Agents—67.8%
Remote Labor Index—5%
GDP.pdf—23.8%

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10071494
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13157.27
ARC-AGI-2—84.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—94%
ARC-AGI-1—95.5%
CritPt—14.3%
Chess Puzzles—47%
Mystery Game Puzzles—37%
DTBench—96.8%
LMCA—50.4%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—71.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—36.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1507
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—94.8%
SimpleQA Verified—69.2%
LMArena Expert—1508
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision—1316
Furniture Assembly—26.7%

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English10001484
LMArena Chinese—1548
LMArena French—1505
LMArena German—1498
LMArena Japanese—1512
LMArena Korean—1483
LMArena Russian—1516
LMArena Spanish—1503

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10471483

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1492

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text10541486
LMArena Creative Writing10891490
LMArena Multi-Turn10131489
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1723

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 3.7 Flash share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44.

Related comparisons

Go deeper