Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 7 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B

Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Summary

They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 74.0 to 19.1.
Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GPT-6 Sol specifications
	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
Provider	Technology Innovation Institute	OpenAI
Noometry Index	32.2	61.8
Released	2023-09-06	2026-09-22
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	—	1.05M
Max output	—	128K
Input $ / M tokens	—	$2
Output $ / M tokens	—	$10
Results tracked	16	45

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
DeepSWE	—	68.8%
FrontierCode	—	49.3%
LMArena WebDev	—	1688
SciCode	—	57.6%
LMArena Coding	—	1447
ALE-Bench	—	2,462

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
APEX-Agents	—	54.3%
GDP.pdf	—	26.4%
Vending-Bench 2	—	14,428

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts	1007	1418
Epoch Capabilities Index	112.13	162.72
ARC-AGI-2	—	89.6%
NYT Connections (extended)	—	90.1%
ARC-AGI-1	—	95.5%
CritPt	—	30.9%
EBR-Bench	—	53.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	56%
DTBench	—	97.3%
LMCA	—	59.1%
HellaSwag	89%	—
LAMBADA	79.8%	—
PIQA	84.9%	—
WinoGrande	87.1%	—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	89.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4	—	90%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	100%
ProofBench	—	83%
LMArena Math	—	1402
GSM8K	54.4%	—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
GPQA Diamond	—	94.3%
SimpleQA Verified	—	60.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate	—	6.5%
LMArena Expert	—	1439
ARC (AI2) Challenge	67.8%	—
BoolQ	89%	—
MMLU	70.6%	—
OpenBookQA	64.2%	—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision	—	1245
Blueprint-Bench 2	—	36.9%
Furniture Assembly	—	58.3%

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Non-English	1000	1385
LMArena Chinese	—	1405
LMArena French	—	1410
LMArena German	—	1390
LMArena Japanese	—	1385
LMArena Korean	—	1341
LMArena Russian	—	1401
LMArena Spanish	—	1384

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following	1047	1412

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query	—	1411

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-180B	GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text	1054	1395
LMArena Creative Writing	1089	1378
LMArena Multi-Turn	1013	1412
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	—	2125

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-6 Sol?