Model comparison

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Eurus-2-7B-PRIME does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Eurus-2-7B-PRIME scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 61.7 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33.9% for Eurus-2-7B-PRIME and 92.7% for Qwen3.8 Max.
  • Eurus-2-7B-PRIME has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Eurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
ProviderShanghai AI LabAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index26.756.8
Released2024-12-312026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: 16.3, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond33.9%92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Eurus-2-7B-PRIME better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Eurus-2-7B-PRIME does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Eurus-2-7B-PRIME and Qwen3.8 Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Eurus-2-7B-PRIME has 1 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper