Noometry

Model comparison

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Eurus-2-7B-PRIME does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME Shanghai AI Lab

26.7

Unranked Sparse

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Eurus-2-7B-PRIME scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.6 leads 63.3 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33.9% for Eurus-2-7B-PRIME and 94% for Grok 4.6.
  • Eurus-2-7B-PRIME has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Eurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
ProviderShanghai AI LabxAI
Noometry Index26.756.9
Released2024-12-312026-08-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked149

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
LMArena Coding—1465
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1447
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.44

Math Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
LMArena Math—1423

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: 16.3, Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
GPQA Diamond33.9%94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English—1420
LMArena Chinese—1480
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1376
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Russian—1422
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following—1431

Long Context Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query—1454

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Eurus-2-7B-PRIME: —, Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

BenchmarkEurus-2-7B-PRIMEGrok 4.6
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1428
LMArena Multi-Turn—1425

Frequently asked questions

Is Eurus-2-7B-PRIME better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Eurus-2-7B-PRIME does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Eurus-2-7B-PRIME and Grok 4.6 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Eurus-2-7B-PRIME has 1 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper