Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Yi-1.5-34B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 37.6.
- Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1160 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1120 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1139 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1144 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Yi-1.5-34B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Yi-1.5-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.