Model comparison
Codestral vs ERNIE 5.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.0 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1481 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1492 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1508 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1471 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than ERNIE 5.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and ERNIE 5.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.