Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1460 |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1440 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.