Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.7 to 41.5.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1457 |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1447 |
Knowledge Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1478 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1445 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (44.0 vs 43.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.