Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

44.1

Rank #81 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 39.5 to 32.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 37.3% for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 25.8% for MiMo-V2-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index44.143.0
Released2025-09-292026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1.05M
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$15$0.87
Results tracked7323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.3 (#61), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena WebDev13931433
LMArena Coding14891476
ALE-Bench796.15785.17
SWE-bench Verified71.3%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)71.4%—
SWE-bench Multilingual67%—
SciCode44.7%—
GSO14.7%—
WeirdML47.7%—
AlgoTune1.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.3 (#32), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
Terminal-Bench46.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard73.2%—
GDPval42.5%—
Remote Labor Index2.1%—
τ²-bench Airline72%—
τ²-bench Banking25.3%—
τ²-bench Retail72.4%—
τ²-bench Telecom84.9%—
Cybench60%—
DeepResearch Bench52.6%—
OSWorld62.9%—
LMArena Search1159—
METR Time Horizons67.4%—
Vending-Bench 23,839—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#125), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
NYT Connections (extended)37.3%25.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14621457
ARC-AGI-213.6%—
SimpleBench54.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval6%—
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench83.2%—
LMCA38.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.84—
ForecastBench61.9—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 32.3 (#216), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math14491447
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)23.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
ProofBench19%—
Omni-MATH55.3%—
MATH Level 597.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)15.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#76), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert14821478
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam13.7%—
SimpleQA Verified30.7%—
MMLU-Pro86.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)68.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.8 (#89), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
VPCT39.8%—
LMArena Document1450—

Multilingual Too close to call

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.4 (#69), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English14251416
LMArena Chinese14591456
LMArena French14581469
LMArena German14271417
LMArena Japanese13901366
LMArena Korean14031400
LMArena Russian14371427
LMArena Spanish14571457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.0 (#78), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14591445
IFEval85%—

Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#46), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14761455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.5 (#34), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text14391436
LMArena Creative Writing14421415
LMArena Multi-Turn14651456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1678—
WildBench85.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper