Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Mercury 2.5
ERNIE 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#87); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 37.5 to 22.4.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Mercury 2.5: 22.4
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Mercury 2.5?
ERNIE 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#87); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.