Model comparison
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 33.8 to 28.5.
Side by side
| Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1390 |
Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | — |
Math Too close to call
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1414 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1401 | 1395 |
| Confabulations | 16.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1243 | — |
Multilingual Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1419 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1446 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1374 |
Long Context Too close to call
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1429 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1405 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1501 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.