Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 39.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 60.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.847.5
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked2037

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding14551467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%60.3%
Thematic Generalization41.7%59.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451449
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.65

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math14371450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Expert14281454
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen3.6 Plus: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English14361424
LMArena Chinese15121477
LMArena French14671455
LMArena German14601452
LMArena Japanese13821389
LMArena Korean14061379
LMArena Russian14461434
LMArena Spanish14731432

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14131425

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14221439
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text14451437
LMArena Creative Writing14261404
LMArena Multi-Turn14341438

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper